“Interpretive Analysis
Transcribed interviews,
observational notes, diaries, and samples of human action are treated as text
analogues for interpretive analysis. The data analysis in a hermeneutic study
is carried out in three interrelated processes: thematic analysis, analysis of
exemplars, and the search for paradigm cases. In the thematic analysis, each
case (all interviews, field notes, etc.) is read several times in order to
arrive at a global analysis. (…) From this, an interpretive plan emerges. Each
interview is then read from the perspective of the interpretive plan. As this
microanalysis is carried out, additional lines of inquiry may emerge from the
data and are added to the interpretive plan. (…) From this analysis come
‘exemplars:’ stories or vignettes that capture the meaning in a situation in
such a way that the meaning can then be recognized in another situation that
might have very different objective circumstances. (…) The last aspect of the
interpretive analysis involves the identification of paradigm cases: strong
instances of particular patterns of meaning. Paradigm cases embody the rich
descriptive information necessary for understanding how an individual’s actions
and understandings emerge from his or her situational context: their concerns,
practices and background meanings. They are not reducible to formal theory – to
abstract variables used to predict and control. Rather, what are recognized are
‘family resemblances’ between a paradigm case and a particular clinical
situation that one is trying to understand and explain.” (p59)
Annotation:
Through the use of a hermeneutic interpretative analysis of what the observed describe in their experiences as a microanalysis of the themes that are revealed from it. Leonard describes a three-part interrelated process comprising of the thematic analysis [internal], followed by analysis of exemplars [external] and a paradigm case search [imaginative variation]. This interpretative analysis models to Moustakas’ (1994) phenomenological research methodology. The exemplars in this case are external as they are dependent on other studies and are part of the researcher’s analysis rather than what the researcher is revealing in the subject. The looking for exemplars is an act of external validation. The paradigm case search appears to be health practice specific, and therefore not in its entirety useful beyond healthcare. What the paradigm case search does suggest though is a way to examine the interpretations made by the researcher to ensure that there are no additional explanations. This appears to be what the imaginative variation phase of a phenomenological research methodology seeks to do.
Hi!
ReplyDeleteI have a question that I would be very happy to be asnwered by you: Is it necessary to have paradigm cases in our analysis with Interpretive phenomenology?
I appreciate your answer.
Hi Zohre thanks for your question. Which context are you approaching interpretive phenomenology from? I ask because I am coming to the subject from a non-health care background and I wouldn't like to comment on an area of methodology that is too out of my discipline. There is danger there for me to mislead a health care researcher.
ReplyDelete